Pahalgam, April 22: What the Attack Means for Kashmir's Tourism Economy and India's Security Calculus
- Thoughts Initiative Team

- Apr 22
- 3 min read
On April 22, 2025, 26 civilians — 25 Indian tourists and one Nepali national — were killed by three armed terrorists of Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and its proxy, The Resistance Front (TRF) in the Baisaran Valley meadow near Pahalgam in Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir. One year on, the attack's consequences continue to reshape India's security posture, Kashmir's economic recovery, and the India-Pakistan relationship.
26 | 1st | 3 | 4 Days |
Civilians killed — Baisaran Valley, Apr 22 2025 | Deadliest civilian attack in India since 2008 Mumbai | Attackers — all confirmed Pakistani nationals | Duration of India-Pakistan conflict — May 7-10 2025 |
What happened at Baisaran Valley
At approximately 1:00 to 2:45 pm on April 22, 2025, three to four terrorists entered the Baisaran meadow — a popular tourist destination accessible only by foot or horseback, approximately seven kilometres from Pahalgam town in Anantnag district. Armed with M4 carbines and AK-47s and wearing military-style uniforms, the attackers selectively shot male tourists. Eyewitnesses reported that the attackers appeared to confirm victims' religious identity before shooting. The Resistance Front (TRF), a proxy of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), initially claimed responsibility twice — on the day of the attack and the next day — before retracting.
The Indian government subsequently identified all three attackers as Pakistani nationals. Speaking in the Lok Sabha in July 2025, Home Minister Amit Shah stated that two were confirmed members of Lashkar-e-Taiba, and that voter ID cards, cartridges, and corroborating testimony from locals who had sheltered the attackers established their identity and Pakistan-based provenance. All three were killed by Indian security forces in an operation in Dachigam, approximately 30 km from Srinagar, in July 2025.
India's response and its strategic logic
In the days following the attack, India took a sequence of steps that collectively marked a significant escalation in its Pakistan policy: expulsion of Pakistani nationals, suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, closure of Indian airspace to Pakistani aircraft, and intensified exchanges of fire across the Line of Control. On May 7, 2025, India launched Operation Sindoor — strikes on nine sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir associated with Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed, and Hizbul Mujahideen. A ceasefire was declared on May 10. The indigenous defence platforms deployed during Sindoor — BrahMos missiles, Akashteer air defence units, and Akash interceptor systems — were the same systems whose export performance we tracked in our analysis of how India became the world's quiet defence powerhouse.
Kashmir tourism: the economic damage
The Pahalgam attack struck at the core of Kashmir's primary legitimate economic engine. The valley had recorded over 23 lakh tourist arrivals in 2024 — a figure that represented a decade of painstaking confidence-building following years of insurgency-related disruption. The Baisaran meadow itself, which sees hundreds of visitors daily, was the kind of high-visibility, civilian-accessible tourism infrastructure that India had held up as evidence of Kashmir's normalisation after the August 2019 revocation of Article 370.
In the weeks following the attack, tourist arrivals collapsed. Hotels reported cancellations. Pony operators, shopkeepers, and guesthouse owners — the informal economy that sustains hundreds of thousands of families in the valley — faced abrupt income loss. The broader Kashmir economy, which had been growing at an above-average pace since 2021, absorbed a shock that will take at minimum one full tourism season to recover from.
The security architecture question
The attack exposed a gap in India's security deployment in high-footfall, semi-remote tourist areas. The Baisaran meadow, accessible only by foot or horseback, was not covered by the security cordon that protects road-accessible tourism sites. This gap — between India's stated position that Kashmir is normalised and safe, and the reality of continued militant infiltration and capability — is the central security challenge the attack crystallised. India's foreign policy response, including the engagement of Gulf states that had historically mediated between India and Pakistan, is part of the same strategic reorientation toward calibrated, interest-led diplomacy that we examined in our analysis of India's stand in the 2026 West Asia War.
The Indian government, in the parliamentary debate that followed, did not acknowledge security shortcomings. The broader question — of how a tourist destination that draws hundreds of visitors daily can be adequately secured without militarising the experience that makes it attractive in the first place — remains structurally unresolved.
"Kashmiris came out in large numbers to protest against the attack — an important signal that the valley's civilian population is not aligned with the militants, and one that India's response needs to engage with carefully." — Human Rights Watch, Apr 30 2025
Sources:
Wikipedia — 2025 Pahalgam attack — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Pahalgam_attack
Human Rights Watch — Deadly Attack on Tourists in Jammu and Kashmir, Apr 30 2025 — https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/04/30/deadly-attack-tourists-jammu-and-kashmir
Al Jazeera — India claims to have killed all suspects of Pahalgam attack, Jul 29 2025 — https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/29/rebels-behind-kashmir-attack-that-led-to-pakistan-tensions-killed-india
Wikipedia — 2025 India-Pakistan conflict — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_India%E2%80%93Pakistan_conflict
NPR — India says it killed militants behind Kashmir attack, Jul 30 2025 — https://www.npr.org/2025/07/30/nx-s1-5484831/india-militants-killed-kashmir



Comments